FundingPips is putting its trader payouts and account structures in the spotlight with its latest FundingPips top 5 traders update, reporting a combined $135,369 earned by five traders last week. The leaderboard is notable not only for the size of the rewards, but for how differently those traders are using the firm’s funding models, account allocations and trading sessions.
Gold, or XAUUSD, appears as the favourite asset for all five traders. Four of the five also identify scalping as their trading style, while the remaining trader uses an intraday approach. That combination provides a useful snapshot of the strategies currently producing substantial results within the firm’s trader base.
FundingPips Top 5 Traders Generate $135K
The largest result came from Edward, from Indonesia, who generated $36,394 across four payouts. His profile shows a 2-Step Standard account with a $400K maximum allocation, with XAUUSD as his preferred asset, London as his most-traded session, and scalping as his trading style.
Guoshen Z, from China, followed with $33,479 from two payouts. His profile is particularly interesting because it shows the Zero account model with 2 x $200K accounts, while also identifying XAUUSD and scalping as his core preferences. His most-traded period is the London-New York overlap.
The remaining three traders reported substantial results as well. Ulas S from Turkey made $22,652 from one payout through a $100K 2-Step Flex account, trading XAUUSD during New York with an intraday style. Kyaw Kyaw from Myanmar earned $22,568 through eight payouts using 8 x $50K 2-Step Flex accounts, while Biruk R from Ethiopia generated $20,276 from three payouts across 3 x $100K 2-Step Flex accounts.
Together, the five traders accounted for the reported $135,369 weekly total.
XAUUSD Dominates the FundingPips Leaderboard
The clearest pattern is the universal preference for XAUUSD. That does not mean every FundingPips trader is focused on gold, but the five highlighted performers all selected the same instrument.
For traders, the distinction matters because gold can produce sizeable price movements within relatively short periods. That makes it attractive to scalpers seeking intraday opportunities, while simultaneously making position sizing and drawdown control particularly important.
The session data adds another layer. Edward and Biruk favour London, Guoshen Z trades the London-New York overlap, and Ulas operates primarily during New York. Kyaw Kyaw also trades New York. The leaderboard therefore shows concentration around the major liquidity sessions rather than a single universal trading window.
Multiple Accounts Change the Payout Equation
The account structures are arguably more revealing than the headline earnings.
Three of the highlighted traders use multiple accounts or allocations: Guoshen Z trades 2 x $200K, Kyaw Kyaw has 8 x $50K, and Biruk R has 3 x $100K. This illustrates how experienced prop traders can use account diversification to spread their trading activity across several funded allocations rather than relying entirely on one account.
There is also an interesting contrast in payout frequency. Kyaw Kyaw generated $22,568 through eight payouts, while Ulas S reached $22,652 through just one payout. The similar weekly totals therefore came through very different withdrawal patterns.
That is an important consideration when assessing a prop firm’s payout system. A trader who prefers frequent withdrawals may structure their activity very differently from someone who waits longer and requests a larger reward. FundingPips offers multiple payout structures across its programs, with options varying by account model and including on-demand, weekly, bi-weekly, and monthly arrangements.
What the Trader Profiles Reveal About FundingPips
The leaderboard also highlights the breadth of FundingPips’ account architecture. Its review lists several funding routes, including Two-Step Flex, Two-Step Pro, Two-Step Standard, One-Step Flex and Zero, allowing traders to select structures with different evaluation and payout conditions.
That variety matters because the biggest account is not automatically the most appropriate choice. The profiles in this week’s ranking show traders reaching significant reported earnings through different combinations of account size, number of accounts, evaluation type, and payout frequency.
For prospective traders, the more useful lesson is to match the funding model to an existing trading process. A scalper trading XAUUSD during London may have very different operational requirements from an intraday trader focused on New York. The firm’s rules also differ between programs, including profit targets, drawdown limits, minimum trading days, and payout requirements.
The results also demonstrate why headline payout figures should be considered alongside account rules. FundingPips’ current review notes that some models include consistency requirements or specific conditions attached to higher profit splits, while funded accounts can have restrictions that do not apply during evaluation. A large weekly reward is therefore one data point; the structure used to produce and withdraw it is equally relevant.
A Leaderboard Built Around Payout Visibility
Publishing individual trader profiles serves another purpose beyond celebrating performance. It gives prospective customers a concrete picture of what activity inside the funding ecosystem can look like.
Rather than presenting only a single headline payout, FundingPips shows account type, allocation, preferred asset, trading session, trading style, and payout count. That makes the update more useful for traders comparing their own approach with different funding models.
For traders considering an evaluation, the key takeaway is not to replicate one of these profiles mechanically. Instead, the figures provide examples of different routes to generating rewards: concentrated trading on one account, multiple allocations, frequent withdrawals, or fewer larger payout requests.
FundingPips’ current offering also includes account sizes and funding structures designed around different trading preferences, while its review reports profit splits reaching as high as 100% on certain structures subject to their respective conditions.
The $135,369 weekly figure consequently stands out less as a single record to chase and more as evidence of the different ways traders are using the firm’s account ecosystem. For anyone considering a challenge, understanding those underlying mechanics is more useful than focusing solely on the largest payout.
FundingPips Discount Code
Traders considering FundingPips can currently use the FOREXPROPREVIEWS discount code for 20% off, according to the Forex Prop Reviews offer. Check the full FundingPips review for the latest account structures, challenge rules, and payout conditions before selecting a program.
